Research & insights
Our research philosophy is simple: collect data on real behaviour, compare it against what the workplace was designed to do, and report the gap — including when it contradicts us.
Our method
Every study combines three lenses. Passive data — badge records, sensors, room booking exports and wifi association logs — tells us what happened. Observational studies tell us how a setting was used, not just whether it was occupied. Surveys and interviews tell us why.
We report peak and average separately, name our sample sizes, and publish the limitations. Workplace data is noisy; pretending otherwise is how bad policy gets written.
Reports & articles
Full reports are available on request while our library is being published.
Hybrid Work
Mandated days and attended days rarely match. We look at the shape of a typical week across office portfolios and what it means for how much space you actually need.
Request this reportAnalytics
Most organisations plan against peak occupancy and pay for it every other day of the week. A framework for sizing against both.
Request this reportStrategy
Policies fail on enforcement, not intent. What separates an anchor-day model that holds from one that quietly erodes.
Request this reportDesign
Activity-based working gets blamed for noise and lost territory. The failure is usually in the ratio of settings, not the idea.
Request this reportGet the Edge